Happy Summer!
The season is starting off hot here in Ithaca. Although it might sound manageable to some of you, 91°F is a bit too much for me. I'm going to New Orleans next week...I hope I can go outside!
Anything shy of 113°F is okay for the bed bugs. Unlike us, bed bugs get really active just before they flop over dead from heat. But I’m getting ahead of myself. This week I want to finish reporting on the bed bug presentations I saw at the National Conference on Urban Entomology last month. Today’s topics are
- treatment protocols,
- detection,
- heat treatments,
- pesticides, and
- other bed bug presentations.
Treatment protocols
In-house preventative bed bug program (Molly Stedfast from Virginia Tech)
Stedfast wants to test a preventative protocol for bed bugs that can be carried out by licensed staff members of multifamily properties. She trained staff members on how to vacuum, apply diatomaceous earth, install encasements, use passive monitors, and build a heat box following the University of Florida’s instructions. The idea is that with the diatomaceous earth in wall voids and crevices and the monitors in place, bed bugs introductions won’t turn into infestations. We don’t know the long-term efficacy of this building-wide program, but preventing bed bugs from infesting and taking components in-house has the potential to reduce costs for multifamily properties. Preventative pesticide application of any kind in homes and putting bed bug control in the hands of building staff are controversial, but based on what I heard at NCUE, both are growing trends. If you want to know more about Molly’s work, listen to her present in our last webinar “Taking Control of Bed Bug Treatments” (www.stoppests.org/ipm-training/training-opportunities/stoppests-webinars/taking-control-of-bed-bug-treatments/).
A ProActive approach for commercial bed bug control (Jason Meyers from BASF Pest Control Solutions)
BASF is confident in the residual efficacy of their Phantom® products, AlpineTM dust, and Hydro-Py-300®. Because of the residual efficacy, BASF is piloting a prevention program for hotels. The program includes two applications of the spray and aerosol products and one application of AlpineTM dust each year. The hope is that these applications will prevent an introduction from ever becoming an infestation. So far the results are good from the pilot hotel. Since this blog is for a housing audience I want to reiterate that this program is being designed for hotels, not homes (where people spend a significant amount of time).
There were two other presentations relating to protocols that I wasn’t able to see. “Community-based IPM” by Dini Miller from Virginia Tech and “Bed bug management in hotels” by Ronald Harrison from Orkin LLC. I’m hoping the NCUE website will have abstracts for these presentations before the summer is over.
Detection
Exploring a novel detection technique for the common bed bug (Dong-Hwan Choe from University of California-Riverside)
We know that bed bugs release chemicals. Low concentrations result in attraction. High concentrations result in dispersion. Choe looked detecting these chemicals with a piece of equipment. He could detect bed bugs if they were disturbed. The chemicals seem to go away on the dead bugs that died by heat. But the ones that died from pesticides or cold treatment could be detected with sensitive equipment. Cast skins release some smell too, but they have to be crushed. The equipment needed to apply this research isn’t commercially available yet. If we can narrow down what live bed bugs vs. dead ones “smell” like, this technology could be valuable for detection. For example, one could take the contents of the vacuum bag after vacuuming and see if there is bed bug scent in it…if so, bed bugs were around.
Lab and field evaluations of factors affecting bed bug monitors (Narinderpal Singh from Rutgers University)
Monitors are an important part of a bed bug management program because they reduce human labor involved in inspection, improve the accuracy of detection, and help guide treatments and evaluate results. This study varied the color and size of the moat that captures bed bugs on both active and passive monitors. The researchers also looked at various release rates of CO2 coming from the active monitor setup. Results: black monitors caught more than white. Bigger moats catch more bed bugs. There wasn't significant difference between 200, 300, 400, and 500 mL/min CO2 release rates.
Skin reactions to bed bug bites (Ronald Harrison from Orkin LLC)
When Orkin employees go for training, they have the opportunity to feed bed bugs on themselves. A brave 1,400 volunteers have signed up and thus supplied data on human reactions to bed bug bites. Only 3.8% reacted right away! Only 1.1% showed a reaction after four days or more. These results show that less than 5% of people react to bed bugs when they are first exposed. We don’t know when or how sensitivity develops, but Orkin’s data adds to the argument that you can’t rely on skin reactions to detect a bed bug infestation when it starts.
Canine scent detection: their effectiveness and pitfalls (Richard Cooper from Rutgers University)
Cooper is taking a close look at the Bed Bug Sniffing Dog Industry. The results from his preliminary research were not very encouraging. The companies that did best tried to visually confirm that there were bed bugs wherever the dog alerted. Because every dog-handler team is so different, it will take a sampling of a lot of companies before we get numbers that we can make broad statements about. Working dogs have proven themselves in a number of fields (rescue, drugs, agricultural products), we just have to figure out how to make them (and their handlers) work for bed bugs. Fortunately, many of the firms with bed bug sniffing dogs want to work with Cooper to find the best approach. The big take-homes for me were: make sure someone is trying to visually confirm the presence of bed bugs wherever the dog alerts and have a plan in place for what to do in the areas where the dog alerts, but no one can find a bug.
Using bed bug monitors to maximize effectiveness of bed bug management programs (Changlu Wang from Rutgers University)
Wang, summarized the best practices for monitoring.
- Active monitors are best when a host is not present and is better than or equal to a visual inspection. Leave active monitors out for several nights for best results.
- Passive monitors work best when a host (or CO2 source) is present. To get the best results (which Wang says is 6 times better than a visual inspection), place more than four and wait a week or two before using the results.
- For best detection results, Wang suggests using monitoring followed by visual inspection and resident interviews.
Active monitoring of bed bugs in occupied apartments (Susan Jones from Ohio State University)
The VerifyTM Bed Bug Detector is new to the market. It is an active monitor that releases CO2, pheromone and kairomone to lure in the bugs. Jones presented the first research I had seen. I didn’t jot down numbers (I had to leave and catch a plane), but she said that she did catch bed bugs by placing the device near beds, upholstered furniture, and baseboards. She said it is comparable to the dry ice traps that Rutgers University researchers have studied.
Heat treatments
Effect of high temperatures on residual insecticides used for bed bug treatments (Margie Lehnert from Clemson University)
Lehnert’s robust research is looking at the efficacy of different pesticides on carpet backing, wood, and metal after the sprayed surface is exposed to 135°F for seven hours. Both the immediate kill and residual efficacy is being studied. In short, heat did not change the efficacy of Temprid TM, Transport®, Phantom® SC, Phantom® Aerosol, or Phantom® plus IGR, but they do have different residual on different surfaces. The carpet backing was the most reliable after two weeks. This study will continue for nine months—I can’t wait to see the final results! What she presented supports my advice: treat voids and areas that might be cold spots before the heat treatment happens.
Heat treatments and other non-chemical tools (Stephen Kells from University of Minnesota)
Kells looked at bed bug behavior when exposed to heat. More specifically, he looked at bed bugs exposed to hot air (as if the heater was blowing hot air over them) and bed bug exposed to hot surfaces (as if the object the bug was on got hot). Bed bugs were better at detecting and escaping heat when the object they are on warms up. Take home: the hot air needs to move around a lot (which is why you see fans during heat treatments). If you rely on objects slowly heating up to room temperature, the bugs near the edges of the killing heat (wall voids and cold spots) may escape.
Pesticides
Pyrethroid-resistant bed bugs: Characterization of the cuticle using SEM and GC-MS methods (Reina Koganemaru from Virginia Tech)
A number of factors could be at play in a pesticide resistant bed bug. Maybe there is a mutation in the bug so the chemical can’t do its thing inside. Maybe the bug population has developed an ability to detoxify. Or maybe there is something going on with the pest cuticle (their suit of armor) that prevents the pesticide from getting in. Every population is probably different. Koganemaru is looking at the latter by slicing through bed bugs, taking high-magnification pictures, and measuring the thickness of the cuticles. It looks like the resistant bugs do have a thicker skin, but her research is ongoing.
Ineffectiveness of Over-the-Counter Total-Release Foggers Against the Bed Bug (Susan Jones from Ohio State)
This study was not presented at NCUE, but Jones mentioned it. It's an important one for the multifamily housing audience! The study showed that bed bugs had little, if any, adverse effects after 2 hours direct exposure to the aerosolized pyrethroid(s) from three over-the-counter total-release foggers ("bug bombs" or "foggers"). Even the Harlan strain, the long-term laboratory population that is susceptible to pyrethroids and that served as an internal control in these experiments, was unaffected if the bugs were covered by a thin cloth layer that provided harborage. Tell residents: don't use total-release foggers!
Efficacy of Phantom® SC termiticide-insecticide & Prescription Treatment ® brand ULD ® Hydro-Py-300® on field collected and lab reared bed bug populations (Robert Davis from BASF Pest Control Solutions)
Alpine dust remained effective after 180 days. Phantom products took a while to kill the bugs, but still worked after four months. Lesson learned: know the residual of your product and don’t re-apply if you don’t have to!
There were a few other presentations on pesticides that I was unable to attend. I’ll look carefully at the abstracts when they are published and see if there’s anything to report.
Other bed bug presentations
EPA’s collaborative efforts to combat bed bugs (Susan Jennings from the Environmental Protection Agency)
Jennings discussed the value of collaborating on solutions for the bed bug problem and EPA's collaborative approach to bed bugs. EPA has a multi-pronged strategy that addresses expediting registrations, improving education/outreach activities, and encouraging IPM efforts. Many of EPA's efforts involve collaborating with stakeholders, including the federal partners. Jennings also presented information on key EPA activities such as the Federal Bed Bug Workgroup, the newly released communications clearinghouse for bed bugs (www.epa.gov/bedbugs/bedbug-clearinghouse.html), and the upcoming revisions the efficacy guideline for bed bugs.
Success stories in low-income multifamily housing (Allie Taisey from the Northeastern IPM Center)
I described a few success stories from your properties!
- Portland, OR staff members committed to meet with residents two times before bed bug treatment to assess needs and make sure homes were prepared to receive effective treatment.
- Portland, ME works closely with their pest management firm, a cleaning company, the School IPM program, and residents. Having a contractor routinely steam baseboards in the homes that have a history of bed bugs increases resident participation. Also, an after-school program on IPM resulted in four kids (from different sites) reporting bed bug infestations in their homes. Turns out, communications never reached these homes because the parents spoke a little-known dialect. Tracking language has helped Portland predict the social activities of their residents and thus target bed bug education efforts.
- The executive director of a property in Chambersburg, PA was so knowledgeable about bed bugs that she was able to make the media her friend. She educated the reporter who came to her. Rather than publishing a negative story, the reporter used her as a source of good information.
Bed bug distribution and pesticide incidents in the U.S. (Kaci Buhl from the National Pesticide Information Center)
The National Pesticide Information Center (NPIC) populates a robust website on pest control information and staffs a hotline (npic.orst.edu). Buhl presented some of the data the call center has collected over the past nine years on bed bug inquiries and incidents. Inquiries increased from 45 to 1072 from 2002 to 2010, but dropped to 845in 2011. Inquiries came from all over the country, but New York, New Jersey, California, and Ohio were at the top. Most of the questions were related to health or medical treatment. The most common scenario leading to bed-bug-related pesticide incidents was the caller not following the pesticide label.
NPMA perspectives on bed bug best management practices (Jim Fredericks from NPMA)
If you haven’t checked them out, visit the NPMA sites:
That was a long one. Thanks for tuning in.
Stay cool!